Processing Your Payment

Please do not leave this page until complete. This can take a few moments.

Updated: April 27, 2021

Worcester chamber, UMass Memorial, community groups oppose Mass General Brigham expansion

Photo | Courtesy | Mass General Brigham A rendering of the planned Mass General Brigham outpatient center on West Park Drive in Westborough

A group of Central Massachusetts entities including the Worcester and Marlborough chambers of commerce, UMass Memorial Health and community groups have formed a coalition opposed to Mass General Brigham's expansion plans, which include a new outpatient facility in Westborough.

The opponents, in a new group called the Coalition to Protect Community Care, have cited existing services in Westborough and other areas where Mass General Brigham plans outpatient centers, including Woburn and an expanded site in Westwood, as the healthcare giant looks to grow its footprint outside the immediate Boston area.

UMass Memorial Health, the Worcester-based health provider, first came out in opposition to the Westborough plans in February, as the Worcester Business Journal previously reported.

Now it's joined by Worcester Regional Chamber of Commerce, the Marlborough Regional Chamber of Commerce and community groups including United Way of Central Massachusetts, Central West Justice Center, which has a Worcester office, Worcester Community Action Council, Thrive Support & Advocacy of Marlborough, YWCA Central Massachusetts and the Boys & Girls Club of Worcester.

Coghlin Electrical Contractors of Worcester has also joined, as have other healthcare entities including Shields Health Care Group of Quincy and Wellforce, a company including Lowell General Hospital, MelroseWakefield Hospital and Tufts Medical Center.

The Worcester Regional Chamber of Commerce cited worries about an impact on access to care, local jobs and healthcare costs. The United Way and YWCA both cited a potential worsening of health disparities.

Mass General Brigham, formerly Partners HealthCare, issued a statement in response to the opposition.

"We are focused on bringing primary care, mental health services, ambulatory surgery, imaging  and specialty care to our existing patients in more affordable, cost-effective settings. We have tens of thousands of existing patients that will benefit from getting their care closer to home, instead of driving to Boston," it said.

"The regulatory process currently underway is not intended as a forum for competitors to protect their economic interests. It is supposed to be a determination, on the health care merits, of the value of the investment," the statement said. "If it provides a positive benefit to patients, it should be approved. Our proposed health care projects clearly meet that standard, and will allow us to deliver the right care, at the right time, in the right place and at a lower cost."

The company is going through regulatory reviews now for its expansion plan, which includes new patient buildings at Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston. The Westborough facility would be located in a new building planned for at 1400 W. Park Drive off Route 9.

Sign up for Enews

WBJ Web Partners

Related Content

9 Comments

Anonymous
April 28, 2021
We all know that competition brings better care at a lower cost. Remember when Massachusetts opened up the property and casualty insurance market to out of state companies. The cost of insurance plummeted and product options flourished. It's economics 101. The Chambers of Commerce know this, but prefer to politicize the process. Please leave politics out of health care. It is too important to every human being.
Anonymous
April 28, 2021
I don't pretend to know anything about how Health Insurance companies make decisions, but what I do know is that everyone of those healthcare providers listed in opposition are "out of network" or "Tier 2" [more expensive co-pay] on my Insurance. I was looking forward to having something "in network" near me.
Order a PDF