Big Differences In Senate, House Tax Proposals
The corporate tax changes proposed by the Massachusetts House and Senate have some serious differences that a newly formed conference committee will have to sort out, according to an analysis by the Massachusetts Budget and Policy Center.
Both sides of the Legislature passed bills this year calling for "check-the-box" conformity and "combined reporting," measures intended to prevent companies from avoiding taxes by shifting income from one state to another or using different tax designations at the federal and state level. But the MBPC suggests that the House proposal would create some significant opportunities for companies to avoid taxes that do not exist in the Senate version.
According to the MBPC, the House bill would create a new policy allowing corporations to reduce their taxes by shifting profits to U.S. subsidiaries that have most of their employees outside the country. The Senate bill has no such provision. Several other aspects of the Senate bill would also put more limits on companies' ability to avoid taxes, the analysis indicates.
Another difference in the two proposals is in changes to the corporate tax rate. The House proposal would reduce it from 9.5 percent to 7.5 percent by 2012, while the Senate version would cut it only to 8 percent.
The MRPC says state Department of Revenue estimates show the House bill generating $135 million in FY 2009 and $41 million when the rate cuts are fully phased in, while the Senate version would generate $297 million in FY 2009 and $169 million when fully implemented.
WBJ Web Partners
Most Recent
Most Recent
0 Comments