Moody’s: New Health Care Law Will Hurt Mass. Hospitals
The health care cost control law signed by Gov. Deval Patrick on Monday will hurt the bottom lines of Massachusetts hospitals and limit their flexibility to grow, a major credit rating agency warned Monday.
The analysis of the new law also suggested the money derived from a $225-million one-time assessment on health plans and major health care providers to help support community hospitals would artificially work to keep smaller hospitals in business, while limiting expansion opportunities for larger hospital groups and hurting their credit standings.
“Another negative credit effect of the bill is that the state will use an excise tax on insurers to support smaller and less profitable hospitals, potentially allowing them to remain in business longer than would otherwise be possible and limiting the ability of larger systems to consolidate and grow through acquisitions,” Moody’s wrote.
Joined by legislative leaders, Patrick signed the new law Monday. Supporters say it will build off the successes of the 2006 law that has led to more than 98 percent of residents having health insurance.
The Massachusetts Hospital Association (MHA) called the law “immensely complex.”
“The hospital community supports the law’s objectives and praises many of its provisions, even as we have expressed concerns regarding select provisions,” the MHA said in a statement.
The hospital group said it will be a “challenge” to successfully implement the law, but said “overcoming challenges in Massachusetts health care is what we all do best. Thoughtful collaboration got us this far and it will get us the rest of the way.”
Though the final bill did not include what Moody’s described as an “onerous” tax on high-cost providers favored by the House, the rating agency said the bill would “publicly expose” hospitals and care groups that fail to meet cost-growth benchmarks laid out in the bill.
The bill will limit year-to-year growth in health care costs to the overall growth rate of the state’s economy for the first five years, dipping half a percentage point lower between 2018 and 2023. It would essentially cut health care costs by $200 billion over the next 15 years.
Though Moody’s said the new commission overseeing the cost-growth targets could not tax or punish hospitals that don’t meet the benchmarks, the bill actually allows the Health Policy Commission to fine a provider up to $500,000 for failing to file or faithfully implement its improvement plan. The penalty, according to the bill, should be a “last resort.”
Further, Moody’s said the requirement that hospitals file a performance improvement plan would “publicly expose organizations that do not meet cost targets.”
The bill also requires state agencies administering health plans for Medicaid patients to adopt alternative payment models for at least 50 percent of Medicaid beneficiaries by July 1, 2014.
“Although the state has yet to provide specifics of those alternative models, we expect them to include bundled payments and shared savings models that are substantially different from the current fee-for-service model. We expect the new reimbursement models will reduce hospital revenues,” Moody’s wrote.
Gov. Patrick on Monday said the shift would improve the quality of care, instead of rewarding quantity.
“We are ushering in the end of the fee-for-service care system in Massachusetts in favor of better care at lower cost,” Patrick said.
Moody’s said hospitals that fail to adapt quickly will likely lose revenue, though the rating agency said it could not estimate how much given that the payment models have not yet been defined.
Last week, Patrick said he was not concerned that the cost-growth limits would negatively impact employment or force hospital closures.
Atrius Health CEO Gene Lindsey predicted that the bill could lead jobs to “migrate” from hospitals to other institutions but it could actually be an economic boon for the industry. “I think there is plenty of work available,” Lindsey said.
In an interview on Friday, Housing and Economic Development Secretary Greg Bialecki said the state’s new health care system may include more jobs outside of hospitals than the current system, which means workers will need to be trained in providing care at home and other non-hospital settings.
Read more
Health Insurance Rates To Rise 2.1% In Quarter
New Mental Health Hospital Opens In Worcester
Bay State Health Care, Take Two: Industry Players See Risks, Opportunity In New Law
WBJ Web Partners
Most Recent
Most Recent
0 Comments